bug#1067: [BusyBox] bug#1067: Not busybox's fault

[Erik Andersen]

On Mon Oct 23, 2000 at 02:06:50PM -0500, David Douthitt wrote:
> I tried busybox from CVS with the insmod from 0.47; same result.  I 
> tried insmod from Debian 2.1; same result.  Then I got strace, and 
> ran it.  The same result (basically) on "busybox insmod tulip.o", 
> "busybox insmod eepro100.o", and "insmod tulip.o".
> 
> I hope I'm not stepping out of line when I ask for FURTHER 
> assistance.... I appreciate all of you working hard!
> 
> What actually causes the SEGFAULT here?  Here's the strace output 
> from one of the runs (I picked "busybox insmod tulip.o"):

Hmm.  How odd.  Could you try again using ltrace?  This will 
also tell me what library calls are being made at the point
when it chokes,

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersen at lineo.com
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--