<div dir="ltr">gcc 4.6.3 with EABI is fine (as expected)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Thomas Petazzoni <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com" target="_blank">thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear hayate,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:24:55 +0800, hayate wrote:<br>
<br>
> arm little endian; generic arm; OABI; gcc 4.6.3 with c++ support;<br>
> uclibc 0.9.31.1<br>
<br>
</div>Can you test with EABI?<br>
<br>
Really OABI is deprecated. It would not be surprising at all that there<br>
are issues with OABI.<br>
<br>
Do you have a compelling reason to stick with OABI if you are making a<br>
new toolchain?<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Thomas<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons<br>
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux<br>
development, consulting, training and support.<br>
<a href="http://free-electrons.com" target="_blank">http://free-electrons.com</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>