[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/refpolicy: Add patches pending the next release

Adam Duskett aduskett at gmail.com
Sat May 1 22:10:11 UTC 2021


Not sure if this patch is abandoned or not. Just wanted to say that
with the bump to 20210203,
the only patches that apply are:
 - 0005-getty-utilize-auth_use_nsswitch.patch
 - 0006-systemd-tmpfiles-utilize-auth_use_nsswitch.patch
 - 0008-pending-upstreaming-Fixes-for-Buildroot-to-boot-in-e.patch

It might be worth making another patch series with just those three
patches and the buildroot module.

Adam

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 1:59 AM Maxime Chevallier
<maxime.chevallier at bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 17:55:43 +0100
> Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >On Thu,  7 Jan 2021 14:53:05 +0100
> >Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier at bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> >> diff --git a/package/refpolicy/0001-pending-next-release.patch b/package/refpolicy/0001-pending-next-release.patch
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000..e049845638
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/package/refpolicy/0001-pending-next-release.patch
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,673 @@
> >> +From 2566e2dac2c759392e0b9f3d442b8489b726cb10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> +From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart at bootlin.com>
> >> +Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:38:13 +0200
> >> +Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [pending next release]
> >
> >Could you generate patches for packages with git format-patch -N to
> >avoid the numbering PATCH X/Y ? This is normally caught by "make
> >check-package".
>
> OK I'll do that.
>
> >Also, this particular patch is apparently a huge aggregation of several
> >individual upstream commits. We do want to have each individual commit
> >as a separate patch in Buildroot, with a reference to the upstream
> >commit, a bit like this:
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart ...
> >Upstream: link to upstream commit, or at least commit hash
> >Signed-off-by: You
>
> OK I'll resubmit with individual patches. I wanted to ease the task by
> grouping patches that could be removed all at once in the next release.
>
> I hope that having a large number of patches bundled with the refpolicy
> package will be acceptable.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Maxime
>
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Thomas
>
>
>
> --
> Maxime Chevallier, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot


More information about the buildroot mailing list