[Buildroot] [PATCH v3 5/5] DEVELOPERS: add me as a co-maintainer for rk3399 based targets

Heiko Thiery heiko.thiery at gmail.com
Wed Mar 18 18:05:16 UTC 2020


Hi,

Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com> schrieb am Mi., 18. März 2020,
18:07:

> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:21 PM Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sunil,
> >
> > Am Mi., 18. März 2020 um 14:46 Uhr schrieb <sunil at amarulasolutions.com>:
> > >
> > > From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil at amarulasolutions.com>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh <sunil at amarulasolutions.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes for v3:
> > > New patch added to this series. Split one changeset from patch #4 and
> made
> > > it patch #5
> > >
> > > Changes for v2:
> > > didn't exist
> > >
> > >  DEVELOPERS | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/DEVELOPERS b/DEVELOPERS
> > > index 98220a9..faa72a4 100644
> > > --- a/DEVELOPERS
> > > +++ b/DEVELOPERS
> > > @@ -1114,6 +1114,7 @@ N:        Ismael Luceno <ismael at iodev.co.uk>
> > >  F:     package/axel/
> > >
> > >  N:     Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> > > +N:     Suniel Mahesh <sunil at amarulasolutions.com>
> >
> > I think what you're are doing here will not work. You have to have
> > your own list of supported files or pathes. And put your name at the
> > right position in the DEVELOPERS file (alphabetically sorted).
>
> Doesn't it have a possibility of co-developer concept in buildroot
> like we do have linux maintainers file? I feel it makes sense to have
> it or the goal of this DEVELOPERS file seems different as what we
> think?
>
> Jagan.
>

I'm not sure and I will check that.

-- 
Heiko

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20200318/ce94d77a/attachment.html>


More information about the buildroot mailing list