[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/4] package/arm-gnu-a-toolchain: new package
thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com
Sun Feb 16 23:28:39 UTC 2020
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:32:46 +0100
Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc> wrote:
> > pre-built bate metal ARM GNU-A toolchain installs into the host file
> > system folder
> > /opt/gcc-arm-none-eabi.
> > https://developer.arm.com/-/media/Files/downloads/gnu-a/9.2-2019.12/binrel/gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-x86_64-arm-none-eabi.tar.xz
> Can this be some kind of virtual package? What if I don't like a
> binary, if I don't have a x86_64 buildhost or want to have another gcc
We can only support a pre-built toolchain for this: our toolchain
infrastructure only supports building a single toolchain, which is the
toolchain targetting Linux. Here, it's only for the case where the
target architecture is ARM64, *but* some firmware needs to be built for
ARM32 that we need a secondary toolchain.
To solve this, in the context of Buildroot, there is not much choice
besides using a pre-built toolchain for this secondary toolchain.
If you need another toolchain for some other firmware, then just create
a different package for it, and use it when building your firmware.
Creating a virtual package would make things more complicated here: one
can only "depends on" a virtual package, so the user would have to know
that he needs to enable this toolchain package in order to be able to
I believe what is being proposed here is the most reasonable solution
we can do while keeping things simple.
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
More information about the buildroot