[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/util-linux: fix licence definition formatting

[Carlos Santos]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:44 AM Simon Rowe <simon.rowe at citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Rowe <simon.rowe at citrix.com>
> ---
>  package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> index 534cff2..7bd7a89 100644
> --- a/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> +++ b/package/util-linux/util-linux.mk
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ UTIL_LINUX_SITE = $(BR2_KERNEL_MIRROR)/linux/utils/util-linux/v$(UTIL_LINUX_VERS
>
>  # README.licensing claims that some files are GPL-2.0 only, but this is not true.
>  # Some files are GPL-3.0+ but only in tests. rfkill uses an ISC-style license.
> -UTIL_LINUX_LICENSE = GPL-2.0+, BSD-4-Clause, LGPL-2.1+ (libblkid, libfdisk, libmount), BSD-3-Clause (libuuid) ISC (rfkill)
> +UTIL_LINUX_LICENSE = GPL-2.0+, BSD-4-Clause, LGPL-2.1+ (libblkid, libfdisk, libmount), BSD-3-Clause (libuuid), ISC (rfkill)
>  UTIL_LINUX_LICENSE_FILES = README.licensing \
>         Documentation/licenses/COPYING.BSD-3-Clause \
>         Documentation/licenses/COPYING.BSD-4-Clause-UC \
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

Reviewed-by: Carlos Santos <unixmania at gmail.com>