[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/mender: bump version to 2.0

[Arnout Vandecappelle]

On 29/05/2019 15:24, Raul Hidalgo Caballero wrote:
> For me, aduskett's patch is okey. 
> But for me is important to have the latest mender and mender-artifact in
> the 2019.05 as it will be our main update mechanism for a bus system

 Sorry, that's not going to happen. We don't do version bumps anymore for
2019.05. Only pure security bumps.

 Regards,
 Arnout

> 
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:03 AM Mirza Krak <mirza.krak at northern.tech> wrote:
> 
>     On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:39 PM Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout at mind.be
>     <mailto:arnout at mind.be>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>         On 28/05/2019 20:47, Mirza Krak wrote:
>         > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:59 PM <deinok at deinok.com
>         <mailto:deinok at deinok.com>> wrote:
>         >>
>         >> From: deinok <deinok at deinok.com <mailto:deinok at deinok.com>>
>         >>
>         >> Signed-off-by: deinok <deinok at deinok.com <mailto:deinok at deinok.com>>
>         >> ---
>         >>  package/mender/Config.in   | 1 +
>         >>  package/mender/mender.hash | 2 +-
>         >>  package/mender/mender.mk <http://mender.mk>   | 3 ++-
>         >>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>         >
>         >
>         > There is already a patch pending for the 2.0.0 bump, [1].
>         >
>         > [1]. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1097130/
> 
>          That one, however, is marked as Changes Requested because it failed to
>         explain
>         why the license file hashes have changed.
> 
> 
>     Yeah I noticed that, but what I was trying to get at was to try to
>     coordinate this instead of creating duplicates.
> 
> 
>          Since this patch doesn't even update the license file hashes, I've alse
>         marked
>         it as changes requested. Hint: test the version bump with 'make legal-info'.
> 
> 
>     For info to who ever creates a v2 patch, the license hash change in
>     mendersoftware/mender is due to a an update to copyright year in the LICENSE
>     file. The vendor hashes only seem to have different indentation and that is
>     why git produced a diff, the hashes seem to be the same.
> 
>     -- 
>     Mirza Krak | Embedded Solutions Architect | https://mender.io
> 
>      Northern.tech AS <https://northern.tech> | @northerntechHQ
>     <https://twitter.com/northerntechhq>
> 
> 
> 
>