[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: enable musl for riscv
Peter Korsgaard
peter at korsgaard.com
Tue Jul 30 16:25:07 UTC 2019
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com> writes:
> Hello,
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:23:31 +0200
> Jörg Krause <joerg.krause at embedded.rocks> wrote:
>> Since version 1.1.23 musl supports the RISC-V architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jörg Krause <joerg.krause at embedded.rocks>
>> ---
>> toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
>> index d9f16e2a3a..b4168bd40c 100644
>> --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
>> +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in
>> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_MUSL
>> depends on BR2_aarch64 || BR2_arm || BR2_armeb || BR2_i386 || \
>> BR2_microblaze || BR2_mips || BR2_mipsel || BR2_mips64 || \
>> BR2_mips64el || BR2_or1k || BR2_powerpc || BR2_powerpc64 || \
>> - BR2_powerpc64le || BR2_sh || BR2_x86_64
>> + BR2_powerpc64le || BR2_riscv || BR2_sh || BR2_x86_64
> My understanding is that musl 1.1.23 only supports RISC-V 64 bits, not
> RISC-V 32 bits, so that should probably be "BR2_RISCV_64" instead of
> just "BR2_riscv".
Ups, indeed - I'll fix that up.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot
mailing list