[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] test-pkg: Force checking dependencies.

Yann E. MORIN yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
Tue Jan 1 09:59:01 UTC 2019


Adam, All,

On 2018-12-31 13:43 -0500, aduskett at gmail.com spake thusly:
> From: Adam Duskett <Aduskett at gmail.com>
> 
> Currently, if a user runs "make" while specifying a specific package
> (IE: make -p foo),  the Makefile logic skips checking to see if all the
> dependencies are selected in the specified packages config file. This behavior
> is useful to test simple packages which do not have "complex" dependencies.
> 
> However; if a developer uses test-pkg -p ${package_name} to check their package,
> the package may pass all the checks, but would have otherwise failed with a
> simple "make" because the developer may have failed to add a select line in
> packages config file, even if there is a new dependency in the packages
> Makefile.
> 
> Pass the environment variable "FORCE_CHECK_DEPENDENCIES"  to the Makefile in
> the test-pkg script,  and check it's value in the Makefile. If the value is
> "YES" force checking for dependency issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Duskett <Aduskett at gmail.com>
> ---
>  Makefile       | 9 ++++++++-
>  utils/test-pkg | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index c5b78b3274..bc83c6505f 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -550,9 +550,16 @@ include $(BR2_EXTERNAL_MKS)
>  #
>  # Only trigger the check for default builds. If the user forces building
>  # a package, even if not enabled in the configuration, we want to accept
> -# it.
> +# it. However; we also want to be able to force checking the dependencies
> +# if the user so desires. Forcing a dependency check is useful in the case
> +# of test-pkg, as we want to make sure during testing, that a package has
> +# all the dependencies selected in the config file.
>  #
>  ifeq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),)
> +FORCE_CHECK_DEPENDENCIES = YES
> +endif
> +
> +ifeq ($(FORCE_CHECK_DEPENDENCIES),YES)
>  
>  define CHECK_ONE_DEPENDENCY
>  ifeq ($$($(2)_TYPE),target)
> diff --git a/utils/test-pkg b/utils/test-pkg
> index e4f68ed061..e54990a349 100755
> --- a/utils/test-pkg
> +++ b/utils/test-pkg
> @@ -146,19 +146,19 @@ build_one() {
>      rm -f "${dir}/missing.config"
>  
>      if [ -n "${pkg}" ]; then
> -        if ! make O="${dir}" "${pkg}-dirclean" >> "${dir}/logfile" 2>&1; then
> +        if ! FORCE_CHECK_DEPENDENCIES=YES make O="${dir}" "${pkg}-dirclean" >> "${dir}/logfile" 2>&1; then
>              return 2
>          fi
>      fi
>  
>      # shellcheck disable=SC2086
> -    if ! make O="${dir}" ${pkg} >> "${dir}/logfile" 2>&1; then
> +    if ! FORCE_CHECK_DEPENDENCIES=YES make O="${dir}" ${pkg} >> "${dir}/logfile" 2>&1; then

I think we only really need it here, not in the two other places.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

>          return 2
>      fi
>  
>      # legal-info done systematically, because some packages have different
>      # sources depending on the configuration (e.g. lua-5.2 vs. lua-5.3)
> -    if ! make O="${dir}" legal-info >> "${dir}/logfile" 2>&1; then
> +    if ! FORCE_CHECK_DEPENDENCIES=YES make O="${dir}" legal-info >> "${dir}/logfile" 2>&1; then
>          return 3
>      fi
>  }
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'


More information about the buildroot mailing list