[Buildroot] [RFC PATCH v4 5/9] llvm: add config to build backend for host arch
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com
Fri Jun 15 20:10:39 UTC 2018
Hello,
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:48:16 -0700, Joseph Kogut wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Kogut <joseph.kogut at gmail.com>
> ---
> package/llvm/Config.in | 11 +++++++++++
> package/llvm/llvm.mk | 9 ++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/llvm/Config.in b/package/llvm/Config.in
> index 83e94660eb..dd07b23e07 100644
> --- a/package/llvm/Config.in
> +++ b/package/llvm/Config.in
> @@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_TARGET_ARCH
> default "ARM" if BR2_arm || BR2_armeb
> default "X86" if BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64
>
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_HOST_ARCH
> + string
> + default "AArch64" if BR2_HOSTARCH="aarch64"
> + default "X86" if BR2_HOSTARCH = "x86" || BR2_HOSTARCH = "x86_64"
> + default "ARM" if BR2_HOSTARCH = "arm"
> +
> config BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM
> bool "llvm"
> depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_ARCH_SUPPORTS
> @@ -27,6 +33,11 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM
>
> http://llvm.org
>
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_ENABLE_HOST_ARCH
> + bool "Build backend for host architecture"
> + help
> + Build code generator for host machine.
So I'm going to disagree a bit with Valentin on this one. If I
understand correctly, this option is going to change what host-llvm
builds, not what the target llvm package builds. So it is a host
package option, and as such is more logically named
BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_LLVM_<something>.
*But* they should be moved to a new package/llvm/Config.in.host file,
and BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_LLVM_ENABLE_HOST_ARCH should be made a blind
option (i.e without prompt). This blind option will be selected by
whichever package needs host architecture support in host-llvm.
> diff --git a/package/llvm/llvm.mk b/package/llvm/llvm.mk
> index 3abf428989..50cc74d299 100644
> --- a/package/llvm/llvm.mk
> +++ b/package/llvm/llvm.mk
> @@ -39,8 +39,9 @@ LLVM_CONF_OPTS += -DLLVM_BUILD_GLOBAL_ISEL=OFF
> LLVM_TARGET_ARCH = $(call qstrip,$(BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_TARGET_ARCH))
>
> # Build backend for target architecture. This include backends like AMDGPU.
> +HOST_LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD = $(LLVM_TARGET_ARCH)
> LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD = $(LLVM_TARGET_ARCH)
> -HOST_LLVM_CONF_OPTS += -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="$(subst $(space),;,$(LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD))"
> +HOST_LLVM_CONF_OPTS += -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="$(subst $(space),;,$(HOST_LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD))"
> LLVM_CONF_OPTS += -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="$(subst $(space),;,$(LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD))"
>
> # LLVM target to use for native code generation. This is required for JIT generation.
> @@ -56,9 +57,15 @@ LLVM_CONF_OPTS += -DLLVM_TARGET_ARCH=$(LLVM_TARGET_ARCH)
> # output only $(LLVM_TARGET_ARCH) if not, and mesa3d won't build as
> # it thinks AMDGPU backend is not installed on the target.
> ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_AMDGPU),y)
> +HOST_LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD += AMDGPU
> LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD += AMDGPU
> endif
>
> +# Build backend for host architecture
> +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_ENABLE_HOST_ARCH),y)
> +HOST_LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD += $(call qstrip,$(BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_HOST_ARCH))
> +endif
I think this could be improved. Something like this:
LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD = $(LLVM_TARGET_ARCH)
ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_AMDGPU),y)
LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD += AMDGPU
endif
... potentially more additions to LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD here ...
LLVM_CONF_OPTS += -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="$(subst $(space),;,$(LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD))"
# host-llvm at least needs to build the same targets as the ones needed
# by the target llvm
HOST_LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD = $(LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD)
ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_LLVM_ENABLE_HOST_ARCH),y)
HOST_LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD += $(call qstrip,$(BR2_PACKAGE_LLVM_HOST_ARCH))
endif
HOST_LLVM_CONF_OPTS += -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="$(subst $(space),;,$(HOST_LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD))"
And there you go.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list