[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] whois: bump to version 5.3.1

Carlos Santos casantos at datacom.com.br
Fri Jun 8 12:13:17 UTC 2018


> From: "Fabrice Fontaine" <fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com>
> To: "DATACOM" <casantos at datacom.com.br>
> Cc: "buildroot" <buildroot at buildroot.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 9:02:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] whois: bump to version 5.3.1

> Dear Carlos,

> 2018-06-08 13:57 GMT+02:00 Carlos Santos < [ mailto:casantos at datacom.com.br |
> casantos at datacom.com.br ] > :

>>> From: "Fabrice Fontaine" < [ mailto:fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com |
>> > fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com ] >
>> > To: "buildroot" < [ mailto:buildroot at buildroot.org | buildroot at buildroot.org ] >
>>> Cc: "Fabrice Fontaine" < [ mailto:fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com |
>> > fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com ] >
>> > Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 4:39:03 PM
>> > Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] whois: bump to version 5.3.1

>> [...]
>> > +WHOIS_VERSION = 5.3.1
>>> +WHOIS_SITE = [
>>> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20180522T155750Z/pool/main/w/whois |
>> > http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20180522T155750Z/pool/main/w/whois ]

>> Just out of curiosity, why not [ https://github.com/rfc1036/whois/releases |
>> https://github.com/rfc1036/whois/releases ] ?

> I perfectly understand your curiosity, you can find some answers here:
> - [ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/801032 |
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/801032 ]
> - [ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/801033 |
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/801033 ]

Huh, it's even worst: I just noticed that the tarball name at GitHub
is "v5.3.1.tar.gz", leading to the same situation we faced before in

    https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/849230/

-- 
Carlos Santos (Casantos) - DATACOM, P&D
“Marched towards the enemy, spear upright, armed with the certainty
that only the ignorant can have.” — Epitaph of a volunteer


More information about the buildroot mailing list