[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] nilfs-utils: need NPTL threads

[Kurt Van Dijck]

> Hello,
> 
> On Thu,  4 Jan 2018 11:10:51 +0100, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > nilfs-utils use clock_nanosleep(), which comes with NPTL threads
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt at vandijck-laurijssen.be>
> > ---
> >  package/nilfs-utils/Config.in | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/package/nilfs-utils/Config.in b/package/nilfs-utils/Config.in
> > index 0c6b7a0..9dda27c 100644
> > --- a/package/nilfs-utils/Config.in
> > +++ b/package/nilfs-utils/Config.in
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >  config BR2_PACKAGE_NILFS_UTILS
> >  	bool "nilfs-utils"
> >  	depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS # sem_open()
> > +	depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_NPTL # clock_nanosleep()
> >  	depends on BR2_USE_MMU # util-linux libmount, libblkid
> >  	select BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LIBUUID
> >  	select BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LIBBLKID
> 
> You forgot to update the Config.in comment accordingly. Also, I've
> updated the commit log to summarize why we keep both the threads *and*
> NPTL dependencies, even though it might look redundant.
> 
> Applied with those changes. Thanks!

Only now, after having seen the commit, I realise you all meant the
'comment' section below, and not the '# clock_nanosleep()' comment :-)

Thanks,
Kurt