[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] msgpack: bump version to 2.1.5

[Bradford Barr]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout at mind.be> wrote:
>  I was about to apply, however:
>
> On 18-09-17 17:58, Bradford Barr wrote:
>> From: bradford barr <bradford at density.io>
>>
>> Modern versions of msgpack are hosted on Github. Msgpack switched their build
>> systems from autotools to cmake a while back. The licence was also updated from
>> Apache to Boost.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: bradford barr <bradford at density.io>
>> ---
>>  package/msgpack/msgpack.hash |  2 +-
>>  package/msgpack/msgpack.mk   | 13 +++++++++----
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/package/msgpack/msgpack.hash b/package/msgpack/msgpack.hash
>> index 8cd8cb6..f1033ad 100644
>> --- a/package/msgpack/msgpack.hash
>> +++ b/package/msgpack/msgpack.hash
>> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
>>  # Locally computed:
>> -sha256  97a371ef950c89f48e8dba6abeccab07f1887e9ba6dab921de0f985c7d5075fe  msgpack-0.5.4.tar.gz
>> +sha256  9c87f80fc651b900772deaef0ab154b63160c74d292529b5be6d06d6485d4640  msgpack-2.1.5.tar.gz
>> diff --git a/package/msgpack/msgpack.mk b/package/msgpack/msgpack.mk
>> index 9e23948..66dbc8d 100644
>> --- a/package/msgpack/msgpack.mk
>> +++ b/package/msgpack/msgpack.mk
>> @@ -4,9 +4,14 @@
>>  #
>>  ################################################################################
>>
>> -MSGPACK_VERSION = 0.5.4
>> -MSGPACK_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/msgpack/msgpack/cpp
>> -MSGPACK_LICENSE = Apache-2.0
>> +MSGPACK_VERSION = 2.1.5
>> +MSGPACK_SITE = $(call github,msgpack,msgpack-c,cpp-$(MSGPACK_VERSION))
>> +MSGPACK_LICENSE = BSL-1.0
>>  MSGPACK_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
>> +MSGPACK_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
>>
>> -$(eval $(autotools-package))
>> +define MSGPACK_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS
>> +     cp -a $(@D)/libmsgpackc.so* $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib
>> +endef
>
>  Why does the default "make install" not work?

The default "make install" installs all of the header files, cmake
modules, pkg-config files, and the static library along side the
dynamic libraries. I figured it'd be best if the package just
installed the dynamic libraries on the target. Let me know if you'd
prefer the default "make install".

>
>
>> +
>> +$(eval $(cmake-package))
>>
>
> --
> Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
> Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
> Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
> G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
> LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
> GPG fingerprint:  7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF

Thanks,
B