[Buildroot] [PATCH] package/espeak: add comment to ignore 'unmet dependencies'
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Mon May 8 19:49:11 UTC 2017
Hello,
On Sun, 7 May 2017 22:38:56 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> On master 86b4eeccc4, espeak can generate spurious 'unmet dependencies'
> messages:
>
> $ make KCONFIG_SEED=0x7A85DEE0 randconfig
> warning: (BR2_PACKAGE_ESPEAK_AUDIO_BACKEND_ALSA) selects
> BR2_PACKAGE_PORTAUDIO_CXX which has unmet directdependencies
> (BR2_PACKAGE_PORTAUDIO && BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP)
>
> However, the dpendency chain *is* correct. There is something that
> causes the kconfig parser to get really confused...
>
> Add a comment statng the issue is spurious, so noone tries to fix it.
Indeed, I don't see anything wrong in this dependency chain.
> config BR2_PACKAGE_ESPEAK_AUDIO_BACKEND_ALSA
> bool "alsa via portaudio"
> + # Selecting portaudio generates spurious "unmet dependencies"
> + # warnings. Unless you are changing the dependencies of espeak
> + # or portaudio, just ignore those spurious warnings.
> select BR2_PACKAGE_PORTAUDIO
> select BR2_PACKAGE_PORTAUDIO_CXX
Perhaps we could simply add a "depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP" here,
which most likely would silence the warning?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list