[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] xenomai: bump version to 3.0.3
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Tue Mar 21 09:19:01 UTC 2017
Hello,
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:57:35 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > My understanding was that Xenomai 3.x was significantly different from
> > Xenomai 2.x. Should we support both versions? Is Xenomai 3.x now old
> > enough that Xenomai 2.x is considered legacy? What problems will people
> > currently using Xenomai 2.x face if we ask them to move to Xenomai 3.x?
>
> There are some API differences, but (at least in dual-kernel mode), it is
> pretty easy to port over. I think we have lots of packages where version bumps
> introduce slight behavioural changes so I think this is OK.
OK, thanks. As long as it doesn't require people having Xenomai
applications to do a full rewrite, then I'm fine with a bump to 3.X as
opposed to supporting both 2.x and 3.x. Minor adaptations are OK, just
like is often needed when upgrading libraries, as you said.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list