[Buildroot] [PATCH] xlib_libXv: correct license type

Peter Korsgaard peter at korsgaard.com
Fri Mar 17 23:38:40 UTC 2017


>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com> writes:

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com> writes:
 >> The license is actually closer to ICS than MIT, E.G.:
 >> https://opensource.org/licenses/ISC
 >> vs
 >> https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT

 >> From COPYING:
 >> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
 >> documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted,
 >> provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
 >> both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
 >> supporting documentation, and that the names of Digital or MIT not be
 >> used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the
 >> software without specific, written prior permission.

 >> E.G.  this is the normal ICS text which has been extended with a BSD-3c
 >> style advertisinc clause.  Both are permissive licenses, but it is more
 >> correct to call it ICS-like.

 >> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter at korsgaard.com>

 > Committed after fixing up the s/ICS/ISC/ mixup and adding a note about
 > the OpenBSD license template as pointed out by Rahul, thanks!

Committed to 2017.02.x, thanks.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard


More information about the buildroot mailing list