[Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/2] package/physfs: new package
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Sun Mar 5 20:51:37 UTC 2017
Hello,
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:52:48 +0100, Romain Naour wrote:
> PHYSFS_LICENSE = zlib license (physfs), LGPLv2.1+ (lzma)
This is not completely correct. Read src/lzma/lzma.txt for details (and
include it in the license files). The lzma SDK is available under the
following licenses:
1) GNU Lesser General Public License (GNU LGPL)
2) Common Public License (CPL)
3) Simplified license for unmodified code (read SPECIAL EXCEPTION)
4) Proprietary license
So perhaps:
zlib license (physfs), LGPv2.1+ or CPL or special license (lzma)
?
Could you respin after double checking this?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list