[Buildroot] [PATCH] wolfssl: new package

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Prado <sergio.prado at e-labworks.com> writes:

Hi,

 > So I see two possible options:

 > 1. Completely remove these options.
 > 2. Keep these options, documenting that to be useful, it needs out of tree
 > patches that are not public and should be requested via wolfssl website
 > contact page.

 > I'm okay with both options, but I think option 2 is better because it will
 > give Buildroot users the possibility to use wolfssl with
 > nginx/lighttpd/wpa_supplicant in a way the wolfssl project intended. What
 > do you think?

If these options cannot be tested in upstream Buildroot then they imho
shouldn't be there, so +1 for option 1.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard