[Buildroot] [PATCH] x264: needs mmu

[Gustavo Zacarias]

On 02/05/16 12:23, Peter Korsgaard wrote:

> Hmm, is that really generally true? I don't quite see why you cannot
> have madvise() without mmu. Looking at uClibc-ng, the option enabling
> madvise support doesn't depend on MMU support.

I've based the rule on previous 80b9dfce, 5b309e1a and 8d446718 
scenarios and didn't investigate myself.
Regards.