[Buildroot] [v1 1/1] uboot: Add local directory option to menuconfig
aduskett at gmail.com
aduskett at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 01:36:30 UTC 2016
Interesting, as I use the feature quite a bit! I have my linux source as a submodule of my project. I guess I could just point buildroot to the git project of the kernel source as well and achieve the same results.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:50 PM -0400, "Arnout Vandecappelle" <arnout at mind.be> wrote:
On 28-06-16 00:39, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Arnout, All,
>
> On 2016-06-28 00:27 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
>> On 27-06-16 22:57, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> And looking at the commit that introduced it for linux, it is exactly
>>> the case that would have been covered by an override-srcdir:
>>>
>>> commit 73da2ff6f718f2889e3c5024d899f8d58f502863
>>> Author: Rafal Fabich
>>> Date: Sat Feb 23 19:03:30 2013 +0100
>>>
>>> Added local directory as source of kernel code
>>>
>>> Add the option to use a local directory as the source for
>>> building the Linux kernel, which can be useful during
>>> kernel development.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafal Fabich
>>> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
>>> Tested-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard
>>>
>>> Peter, any reason that you applied this patch at the time?
>>> Arnout, anything you remember for giving your ACK?
>>
>> I think at the time I considered using _OVERRIDE_SRCDIR for something like this
>> too clunky. However, now I'm more convinced that every realistic project should
>> have an automatic _OVERRIDE_SRCDIR for everything in $(BR2_EXTERNAL)/src. So
>> then indeed this option is not so relevant anymore.
>
> Well, any two projects would have different workflows, so suggesting a
> "realistic project" uses an automated override-srcdir is just pushing
> the limits too much, IMHO.
Of course. But it's true that the same workflows are covered by
_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR and _CUSTOM_LOCAL.
>
> Besides, my opinion is that having the sources for packages in the
> br2-external tree is bad, and that each package should have its own
> git/hg/svn/bzr tree. But that varies between projects! ;-)
They are git submodules, of course.
In my experience referring to tags or shas from a defconfig is really clunky,
it makes updating extremely inflexible. I've implemented scripts to automate the
tagging for some projects; in the end they didn't use it, because the submodule
tag already covers it.
>
>> It's still a bit clunky, though, that your (def)config has to specify
>> _something_ for the kernel version, but that it will never be used in practice.
>
> Well, that would be the same for any package for which we have a version
> choice when an override-srcdir is in use for that package...
... which is why someone had the idea of adding this option for U-Boot :-)
Regards,
Arnout
>
> And anyway, any override-srcdir should not be versioned I think. It
> should be purely for local development.
>
>> I propose to reject this patch but keep the existing LINUX_CUSTOM_LOCAL around
>> for a bit still.
>
> Well, I saw your mail after I sent the patch, so... ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
>> Regards,
>> Arnout
>>
>>>
>>> So, I would think that:
>>> 1- we don't want this for U-Boot;
>>> 2- we should drop it for Linux.
>>>
>>> Peter, Thomas, Arnout: what do you think?
>> [snip]
>> --
>> Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
>> Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
>> Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
>> G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
>> LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
>> GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
>
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20160628/30e2a8fa/attachment.html>
More information about the buildroot
mailing list