[Buildroot] [PATCH 07/13 v7] support/apply-patches: bail-out on duplicate patch basenames
Yann E. MORIN
yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
Wed Jun 22 21:01:57 UTC 2016
Arnout, All,
On 2016-05-07 22:16 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
> On 05/07/16 18:14, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> >Patches we save can come from various locations;
> > - bundled with Buildroot
> > - downloaded
> > - from one or more global-patch-dir
> >
> >It is possible that two patches lying into different locations have the
> >same basename, like so (first is bundled, second is from an hypothetical
> >global-patch-dir):
> > package/foo/0001-fix-Makefile.patch
> > /path/to/my/patches/foo/0001-fix-Makefile.patch
> >
> >In that case, when running legal-info, we'd save only the second patch,
> >overwriting the first. That would be oproblematic, because:
> >
> > - either the second patch depends on the first, and thus would no longer
> > apply (this is easy to detect, though),
> >
> > - or the second patch does not dpend on the first, and the compliance
> > delivery will not be complete (this is much arder to detect).
> >
> >We fix that by checking that no two patches have the same same basename.
> >If we find that the basename of the patch to be applied collides with
> >that of a previously applied patch, we error out and report the duplicate.
> >
> >The unfortunate side-effect is that existing setups will now break in
> >that situation, but that's a minor, corner-case issue that is easily
> >fixed.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998 at free.fr>
> >Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca at lucaceresoli.net>
> >Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout at mind.be>
> >Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout at mind.be>
>
>
> Regards,
> Arnout
>
> PS When I wrote earlier that this patch was "controversial", I actually
> meant "a patch that is not strictly needed to fix the
> stuff-missing-from-legal-info issue, and which could be skipped".
That's not my position: this patch (or the alternate proposal) is
required.
Without it, we could end up saving two patches with the sqame basename,
the second (e.g. from a global patch dir) overwriting the first (e.g. a
bundled patch), thus rendering the legal-info moot.
I thought I had that properly explained in the commit log. Did I miss
something, or was it not clear enough?
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> >---
> >Changes v6 -> v7:
> > - reword error message
> >
> >Changes v5 -> v6:
> > - don't renumber, detect collision and error out (Luca, Arnout,
> > Thomas)
> >---
> > support/scripts/apply-patches.sh | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/support/scripts/apply-patches.sh b/support/scripts/apply-patches.sh
> >index 20a1552..f8b6ca3 100755
> >--- a/support/scripts/apply-patches.sh
> >+++ b/support/scripts/apply-patches.sh
> >@@ -103,6 +103,14 @@ function apply_patch {
> > echo "Error: missing patch file ${path}/$patch"
> > exit 1
> > fi
> >+ existing="$( grep -E "/${patch}\$" ${builddir}/.applied_patches_list )"
> >+ if [ -n "${existing}" ]; then
> >+ echo "Error: duplicate filename '${patch}'"
> >+ echo "Conflicting files are:"
> >+ echo " already applied: ${existing}"
> >+ echo " to be applied : ${path}/${patch}"
> >+ exit 1
> >+ fi
> > echo "${path}/${patch}" >> ${builddir}/.applied_patches_list
> > ${uncomp} "${path}/$patch" | patch -g0 -p1 -E -d "${builddir}" -t -N $silent
> > if [ $? != 0 ] ; then
> >
>
>
> --
> Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
> Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
> Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
> G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
> LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
> GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
More information about the buildroot
mailing list