[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] iputils: resolve musl compatibility
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Wed Jan 20 08:44:24 UTC 2016
Matt,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:04:23 -0600, Matthew Weber wrote:
> >> diff --git a/package/iputils/iputils.mk b/package/iputils/iputils.mk
> >> index 7510d99..d427b11 100644
> >> --- a/package/iputils/iputils.mk
> >> +++ b/package/iputils/iputils.mk
> >> @@ -4,13 +4,12 @@
> >> #
> >> ################################################################################
> >>
> >> -IPUTILS_VERSION = s20121011
> >> -IPUTILS_SITE = http://www.skbuff.net/iputils
> >> -IPUTILS_SOURCE = iputils-$(IPUTILS_VERSION).tar.bz2
> >> -IPUTILS_LICENSE = GPLv2+, BSD-3c
> >> +IPUTILS_VERSION = c8ff6feaf0442f8efd96ccb415770c54f9e84d47
> >> +IPUTILS_SITE = $(call github,iputils,iputils,$(IPUTILS_VERSION))
> >
> > I don't understand why you are moving to github.
> > http://www.skbuff.net/iputils has some recent tarballs, which
> > correspond to the releases made on github.
> > http://www.skbuff.net/iputils/iputils-s20151218.tar.bz2 will most
> > likely contain the musl fixes.
>
> The releases don't match. The github repository was forked in 2014 to
> pull fixes from other distrobutions and centralize the changes after
> the upstream seemed to have gone dormant. So the fork is the only
> repo that has the musl and other IPv6 updates. I should have
> referenced the email link.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg279881.html
> Thoughts?
OK, understood. Can you just put this in a comment in the .mk file?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list