[Buildroot] [PATCH] socat: security bump to version 2.0.0-b9
Peter Korsgaard
peter at korsgaard.com
Tue Feb 2 15:32:42 UTC 2016
>>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo at zacarias.com.ar> writes:
> Fixes:
> Socat security advisory 7 and MSVR-1499: "Bad DH p parameter in OpenSSL"
> Socat security advisory 8: "Stack overflow in arguments parser"
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo at zacarias.com.ar>
> ---
> .../0002-ptrdiff_t-is-defined-in-stddef.h.patch | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> package/socat/socat.hash | 4 +++-
> package/socat/socat.mk | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 package/socat/0002-ptrdiff_t-is-defined-in-stddef.h.patch
> diff --git a/package/socat/0002-ptrdiff_t-is-defined-in-stddef.h.patch
> b/package/socat/0002-ptrdiff_t-is-defined-in-stddef.h.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7b435a9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/socat/0002-ptrdiff_t-is-defined-in-stddef.h.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +From 99c55f2694fe8621ca2344eb002610dac7f9c969 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo at zacarias.com.ar>
> +Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:34:24 -0300
> +Subject: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is defined in stddef.h
What is this about? A new issue introduced in 2.0.0-b9? Musl fix? Your
commit message didn't mention anything about it?
> # From http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/download.md5sum
> -md5 ff56576703dfdeac221357a348c30760 socat-2.0.0-b8.tar.bz2
> +md5 553b1593d0a192cb09cbdc687ef1baac socat-2.0.0-b9.tar.bz2
> +#
Missing text? Locally calculated?
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot
mailing list