[Buildroot] [PATCH v12 1/1] squeezelite: new package

[kei]

Dear, all.

If it is difficult to host it on buildroot, I can host it on my web site.

Please tell me which is preferred.

Regards,
Kawashima

On 2015/09/25, at 18:12, Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera at imgtec.com> wrote:
> Peter, Thomas, there is an issue commented below and I think it would be
> good to have your opinion on it.
> On 09/25/2015 04:04 AM, kei-k at ca2.so-net.ne.jp wrote:
>> Dear, Vincente.
>> 
>> Thank you for your test and comment.
>> 
>> Vicente Olivert Riera writes:
>>> Dear Hiroshi Kawashima,
>>> 
>>> are you able to download squeezelite? I'm having this problem:
>>> 
>>>>>> squeezelite v1.8 Downloading
>>> Doing shallow clone
>>> Initialized empty Git repository in
>>> /br/output/build/.squeezelite-v1.8.tar.gz.pb3XtQ/squeezelite-v1.8/
>>> remote: Counting objects: 82, done.
>>> Unpacking objects: 100% (82/82), done.
>>> warning: Remote branch v1.8 not found in upstream origin, using HEAD instead
>>> fatal: unable to read tree 668edec073bef579bedf43817f65aee3a592d0ef
>> Hmm...
>> I have been working on my cached source, so I did not realize it.
>> Yes, I can reproduce your problem with real clean buildroot tree.
>> Maybe something changed https://code.google.com/p/squeezelite repo
>> since my last fetch.
>> I'm considering to change SQUEEZELITE_SITE to github repo like:
>> https://github.com/sixeyed/squeezelite
>> Does this repo work for you too ?
> 
> the fact that it works or not is not the problem. The problem is that
> right now there isn't any official repository for that project, so that
> repository could disappear tomorrow. And I don't know if the owner of
> that repository has made any change to the source code or not.
> 
> Perhaps downloading the tarballs from Google Code and putting them in
> mirror.buildroot.org would be the best option. I have added Peter and
> Thomas on CC so they can tell their opinion about this issue.