[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/bluez_utils: fix musl compilation issue

Brendan Heading brendanheading at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 22:09:55 UTC 2015


>  The current version is in bluez5_utils. It had to be a separate package because
> the API has changed from bluez4 to bluez5, so it must be possible to select one
> or the other. So this comment is not really relevant. The bluez5_utils package
> builds fine under musl BTW.
>
>  Of course, because bluez4 predates musl, there is really no reason to try to
> build bluez4 with musl, so an equally acceptable option would be to make it
> depend on !MUSL. However, I think the patch is sufficiently light to be
> acceptable. IMHO, the argument "we prefer not to carry patches that will not
> make it into upstream" doesn't apply for frozen packages, because then there is
> no maintainance effort for the patches (since there is no version bumping).

Many thanks for that Arnout, and for pointing out the bluez5 package.
Comments noted for future reference!

regards

Brendan


More information about the buildroot mailing list