[Buildroot] [PATCH 4/5] gtest: Upgrade to GitHub HEAD

Carlos Santos casantos at datacom.ind.br
Mon Oct 19 19:29:26 UTC 2015


Hello, Thomas and Alan,

> From: "Alan Ott" <alan at softiron.co.uk>
> To: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
> Cc: buildroot at buildroot.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 7:00:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/5] gtest: Upgrade to GitHub HEAD

> On 10/14/2015 05:55 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:51:22 -0400, Alan Ott wrote:
>>
>>> +# The above revision must remain the same as the gmock package
>>> +GTEST_SITE = $(call github,google,googletest,$(GTEST_VERSION))
>>>   GTEST_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
>>>   GTEST_INSTALL_TARGET = NO
>>>   GTEST_LICENSE = BSD-3c
>>>   GTEST_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE
>>> +GTEST_SUBDIR = googletest
>> So gtest and gmock are in fact now part of the same repository/upstream
>> project ? If that's the case, then I think we should simply get rid of
>> the gtest and gmock packages, and have a single package named
>> "googletest".

What about applying the submitted patches now, to fix the repository, and a different patch later to create the "googletest" package?

> Yes, that would probably be better. gmock depends on gtest, and gtest
> can be standalone. Maybe we have one package with a submenu option to
> build each target (and a dependency so gmock selects gtest).
> 
> Is that ok by you?
> 
> Alan.

Do you need any help to do this?

Carlos Santos (Casantos)
DATACOM, P&D


More information about the buildroot mailing list