[Buildroot] Reduce toolchain options
Arnout Vandecappelle
arnout at mind.be
Wed Mar 11 22:04:19 UTC 2015
On 11/03/15 17:14, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
>
> Hi.
> How about we kill non-lfs and non-ipv6 toolchains?
Sounds like a good idea!
> It's 2015 after all, and the size delta is minor:
>
> tar file delta, arm926 uclibc+busybox
> =====================================
> Threading (NPTL) +153600 bytes
> Largefile +20480 bytes
> IPv6 +10240 bytes
> RPC +61440 bytes
> WCHAR +30720 bytes
Could you calculate this with STATIC and thumb and also report the baseline?
IIRC a minimal statically linked busybox was only about 200K so the 20K
largefile is borderline significant...
Regards,
Arnout
>
> Benefits:
> * Less toolchain options to test/care for in packages
> * More bang for the buck for autobuilders with less combinations to test
>
> Even though the size delta would be somewhat more (tiny though) when
> adding packages/libraries that's generally offset by the added size of
> said packages.
>
> The only downside i can think of is badly designed packages that won't
> work well on a non-ipv6 linux kernel. These should be very few, if any.
>
> LFS is a no brainer IMO.
>
> Regards.
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
>
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
More information about the buildroot
mailing list