[Buildroot] [PATCH] libunwind: add patch to fix behavior for ARM < v6

Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Thu May 15 07:51:47 UTC 2014


Dear Baruch Siach,

On Wed, 14 May 2014 23:47:12 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:

> > +-# Don't link against libatomic_ops for now.  We don't want libunwind
> > +-# to depend on libatomic_ops.so.  Fortunately, none of the platforms
> > +-# we care about so far need libatomic_ops.a (everything is done via
> > +-# inline macros).
> > +-#
> > +-#  AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main)
> > ++  AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main)
> 
> For the sake of reproducibility shouldn't we add libatomic_ops to libunwind 
> dependencies when libatomic_ops is enabled?

Yes, you're right! I'll send a patch for that.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com


More information about the buildroot mailing list