[Buildroot] [PATCH 0 of 5 RFC] uclibc/busybox: fix handling of configuration file

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Thomas De Schampheleire,

On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 10:13:28 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:

> > This sounds like a very interesting idea, I'll explore it further in
> > the context of this patch series.
> 
> I'm working on this now, but I wonder which is the right approach wrt
> the organization of the patch series:
> 
> - first line up linux, busybox, uclibc in the way they handle the
> kconfig stuff, then extract this to a kconfig-package framework
> - or first introduce a kconfig-package framework with the 'right'
> handling, then convert each of linux, busybox, uclibc in subsequent
> patches?

I'd say it doesn't matter that much. Maybe the first one allows more
easily to see the functional changes that are made, by really I don't
think it matter. At least on my end, I'd be happy with any of those two
solutions.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com