[Buildroot] [PATCH] luarocks: fix compilation on 64bits
Peter Korsgaard
jacmet at uclibc.org
Wed Jan 15 12:14:54 UTC 2014
>>>>> "François" == François Perrad <francois.perrad at gadz.org> writes:
> 2014/1/15 Peter Korsgaard <jacmet at uclibc.org>:
>>>>>>> "Francois" == Francois Perrad <fperrad at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad at gadz.org>
>>
>> Where did you see this? On the autobuilders? If yes, please add a link.
>>
> in the latest autobuilder report, native Lua modules using the
> `luarocks-package` infrastructure are broken :
> x86_64 | lbase64-20120820-1 | NOK |
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/f28a624f89f4de249a1b7a718f5ae31109ba9171/
> x86_64 | luabitop-1.0.2-1 | NOK |
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/1ead0a162a251d3e7bf8598036fa06c4befeb3d9/
> x86_64 | luaexpat-1.2.0-1 | NOK |
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/0544cead086ba51b45dfa1df114787a8f22eaf8d/
> x86_64 | luafilesystem-1.6.2-1 | NOK |
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/60161d13d596d41dd4059977eb947d72c172f0d5/
>> It's not really about 32bits/64bits, but yes, x86-64 is one of the archs
>> needing -fPIC.
> Yes, x86_64
>> What about BR2_PREFER_STATIC_LIB (for both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS lines)?
> native Lua modules/extensions are always shared lib.
Ok, committed with a reworded commit message, thanks.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot
mailing list