[Buildroot] [PATCH V4 2/2] i.MX: Update versions to match latest Freescale release
Yann E. MORIN
yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
Thu Feb 13 22:52:18 UTC 2014
Eric, All,
On 2014-02-12 19:00 -0700, Eric Nelson spake thusly:
> On 02/12/2014 04:41 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> >However, The cleanest in my opinion would be to extract the archive into
> >a subdir of $(@D), like:
> >
> > # Blurb about auto-extract in a properly-named dir
> > define IMX_LIB_EXTRACT_CMDS
> > cd $(@D); \
> > sh $(DL_DIR)/$(IMX_LIB_SOURCE) --force --auto-accept
>
> And then move them?
> i.e.
> mv $(@D)/packagemname/* $(@D)/
> rm -r $(@D)/packagemname/
No, we would not need to move it. We'd just use it as-is in the
following commands, like I showed below:
> > define IMX_LIB_BUILD_CMDS
> > $(IMX_LIB_MAKE_ENV) $(MAKE1) -C $(@D)/imx-lib-$(FREESCALE_IMX_VERSION)
> > endef
> It seems like over-kill to keep the directory around.
Well, maybe not overkill, but not-so-clean, yes.
> And what about the patch step references?
Boom! :-)
> >Speaking of the EULA, since 'make legal-info' will copy the source file
> >as-is, the EULA will be present in the generated legal-info directory
> >structure. So, I wonder if we really care about extracting it in the
> >first place.
> >
>
> I don't understand well enough to comment,
Basically, Buildroot provides the 'legal-info' infrastructure:
http://buildroot.net/downloads/manual/manual.html#legal-info
> and this too seems like
> the subject of a separate patch.
Well, it'd be a good idea to provide the bump in one patch, since
that's pretty easy, and the extra EULA stuff in a separate patch,
indeed.
So, to sum-up:
- provide a patch that bumps the version;
- just keep the directory layout as-is, we'll live with the warning
but be sure to add a comment above the _EXTRACT_CMDS stating that a
warning will be issued;
- provide a second patch that extracts the EULA; your initial solution
is OK.
> >I'm a bit uneasy with the awk trick to begin with, since it would break
> >without us easily noticing when we bump and the self-extractor no longer
> >uses EULA/EOEULA (since the awk script will happily process its script,
> >and will just print nothing and exit without error).
> >
>
> There may be another way, by executing the extractor first without
> the --accept-eula and re-directing the output.
>
> Again, this seems like the subject of a different patch.
>
> I'd also like to get Freescale to comment on this.
>
> Perhaps we can get them to provide a "--showlicense" in the
> next release, and change things then.
If you have your ways inside Freescale, then it might be a good idea,
yes! Unless they're already reading us. NSA, you there? :-]
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
More information about the buildroot
mailing list