[Buildroot] libglib2 (or maybe libffi) build failure
Mark Jackson
mpfj-list at newflow.co.uk
Wed Nov 27 17:27:14 UTC 2013
On 27/11/13 17:16, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Mark Jackson,
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:03:20 +0000, Mark Jackson wrote:
>
>> Aha ... the previous "buildroot" entry in $PATH is the cuplrit.
>
> Ok. It's true that having an already existing cross-compiler and
> Buildroot installation in the PATH can possibly cause some issues,
> though I'd like this to work properly.
Hmmm .. thinking about it, I don't think I did a make clean when I switched
to my new testing branch.
What's the recommended method ?
I recall I did something like:-
[git clone to directory "buildroot"]
$ git checkout 2013.02 -b good
$ make menuconfig
$ make
... build okay ...
Then when I started on the new "updated" branch:-
$ cp -a buildroot buildroot-bt
$ git checkout origin/master -b master
$ git pull
$ make menuconfig
$ make
... build fails ...
I can see now that this might cause all sorts of config issues !!
>> The foo.log file contains lines such as:-
>>
>> 15616 open("/home/mpfj/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi/sysroot/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libcrypto.pc", O_RDONLY)
>> ^^^^^^^^^
>> I guess it's now in a confused state, so I should do a full clean ?
>
> Can you give us the contents of host/usr/bin/pkg-config ? It is a
> wrapper shell script that sets a bunch of variables and calls pkgconf.
#!/bin/sh
PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=${PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR:-/home/mpfj/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi/sysroot/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/home/mpfj/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi/sysroot/usr/share/pkgconfig} PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR=${PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR:-/home/mpfj/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi/sysroot} $(dirname $0)/pkgconf $@
> I would nonetheless like to have your full "foo.log", to see more
> precisely what's going on with pkg-config.
http://code.bulix.org/p5dd3s-85085
>> If so, can you tell me if it's possible to keep 2 different toolchains in use ?
>>
>> The original "buildroot" path was to my "known-good" buildroot setup (based on
>> 2013.02), but I'm looking to update things to the latest.
>>
>> I'd rather not destroy my existing toolchain setup, so is it possible to set things
>> up to handle 2 buildroots at the same time ?
>
> It is possible, just don't have one in the PATH in a permanent way. The
> way I typically do things is by adjusting the PATH only in the
> shell/terminal I'm going to use the toolchain, or even use the full
> toolchain path.
>
> Again, I believe we should continue to investigate this some more, I'd
> like to understand the root of the problem and see if there's a
> reasonable fix for it (even though I believe there might be several
> other issues in trying to do a Buildroot build with an existing
> Buildroot build in the PATH).
Your help is much appreciated.
More information about the buildroot
mailing list