[Buildroot] [PATCH v2] libnspr: Add dependency on !BR2_xtensa
Baruch Siach
baruch at tkos.co.il
Wed Nov 27 09:02:15 UTC 2013
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:27:20AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:29:24 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > From: Chris Zankel <chris at zankel.net>
> >
> > Xtensa is not yet supported in libnspr. Also add dependencies to
> > libnss, which requires libnspr, and ecryptfs-utils, which requires
> > libnss.
> >
> > Fixes
> > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/14b/14ba6426edbffa100de924aa69157b3f59368ff2/
> >
> > [baruch: fix summary, add autobuild referench, add comment dependency]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <chris at zankel.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
>
> Thanks! However, I wonder if it's not actually easier to include a
> patch to libnspr to add Xtensa support. See
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/291080/ for a patch that adds NIOS2
> support, for example.
That would obviously be better, but I can't properly test a patch adding
libnspr xtensa support at the moment. Note that xtensa has BE and LE variants,
so it's a little more involved that the nios patch.
> That being said, I'm fine with having libnspr disabled on Xtensa, as I
> don't believe that many people will care about
> libnspr/libnss/ecryptfs-utils.
It seems like blackfin needs the same treatment
(http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/dd353703ed94cec48cd126d80cd2f1b039811be4/).
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
More information about the buildroot
mailing list