[Buildroot] uboot-tools and uboot being separate
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com
Wed Feb 13 23:14:04 UTC 2013
Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 23:57:03 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> I've had the same issue once: a patch to add some functionality to
> mkimage that I needed both on the host and on the target.
Then easy enough; put your patch in package/uboot-tools/. It handles
the build and installation of both the host *and* target variant of the
U-Boot tools.
> > No. You don't have to have identical uboot-tools and uboot.
> > Basically uboot-tools provide one tool to create U-Boot images
> > (mkimage) and tools to manipulate the U-Boot environment from Linux
> > (fw_printenv, fw_setenv). Those tools are backward compatible, and
> > so you can perfectly use the tools from U-Boot 2010.x with a
> > running U-Boot 2012.x or 2013.x.
>
> Unless some feature has been added or removed.
In which case you bump the version of the uboot-tools package, just
like any other package.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the buildroot
mailing list