[Buildroot] [PATCH v3] Add package connman

Daniel Mack zonque at gmail.com
Mon Dec 5 23:20:24 UTC 2011


On 12/06/2011 12:13 AM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack <zonque at gmail.com> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  >> What about installing an initscript? I see there's an example init
>  >> script in the connman sources, but that doesn't seem directly applicable
>  >> to our busybox based system.
> 
>  Daniel> Yes, I can write one up.
> 
> Great, thanks.
> 
>  Daniel> Yes, this is the reason why I added resolver support to uClibc some
>  Daniel> months back, and all the stuff in upstream now.
> 
>  >> I don't like to add it if doesn't work with uClibc based toolchains. 
> 
>  Daniel> Well, it does, if you enable UCLIBC_HAS_RESOLVER_SUPPORT. What about
>  Daniel> adding a dependency for that? If people want to have connman, they have
>  Daniel> to manually select this feature and rebuild their uClibc. Does that
>  Daniel> sound ok?
> 
> In concept, yes - But as the RESOLVER_SUPPORT isn't in any release yet,
> it becomes a bit more tricky. We can backport the changes to 0.9.32, but
> existing binary toolchains and ctng (unless Yann agrees and we also
> backport to there) stuff will fail.

In a previous discussion on this list I was asking about just this, and
back then you agreed we could depend on BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_SNAPSHOT in
such a case until there's a new release.

> I'll take a look at it.

Ok, great. I'll post a new version with the discussed topics and leave
the decision of how to handle the toolchain deps to you. Is that ok for you?


Daniel


More information about the buildroot mailing list