[Buildroot] [PATCH 03/10] iso9660: take into account the linux changes
Peter Korsgaard
jacmet at uclibc.org
Fri Jun 18 19:32:14 UTC 2010
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> writes:
Thomas> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com>
Thomas> ---
Thomas> fs/iso9660/Config.in | 4 ++--
Thomas> fs/iso9660/iso9660.mk | 6 +++---
Thomas> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Thomas> diff --git a/fs/iso9660/Config.in b/fs/iso9660/Config.in
Thomas> index 7830581..5f7cdf4 100644
Thomas> --- a/fs/iso9660/Config.in
Thomas> +++ b/fs/iso9660/Config.in
Thomas> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Thomas> config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660
Thomas> bool "iso image"
Thomas> depends on BR2_i386
Thomas> - depends on !BR2_KERNEL_none
Thomas> + depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
Thomas> select BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2
Thomas> select BR2_TARGET_GRUB
Thomas> help
Thomas> @@ -13,4 +13,4 @@ config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660_BOOT_MENU
Thomas> default "fs/iso9660/menu.lst"
Thomas> comment "iso image requires a Linux kernel to be built"
Thomas> - depends on BR2_i386 && BR2_KERNEL_none
Thomas> + depends on BR2_i386 && !BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
I know you're not the author of this, but any reason this shouldn't work
on x86-64 as well?
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
More information about the buildroot
mailing list