[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] openssl: convert to Makefile.autotools.in and bump version to 0.9.8g

Hans-Christian Egtvedt hans-christian.egtvedt at atmel.com
Wed Aug 13 05:39:18 UTC 2008


On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:24 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> > This patch converts building of OpenSSL to use Makefile.autotools.in and bumps
> 
> OpenSSL doesn't use autotools though, so is this a good idea?
> 
> > +$(OPENSSL_TARGET_CONFIGURE):
> > +	(cd $(OPENSSL_DIR); \
> > +		$(TARGET_CONFIGURE_ARGS) \
> > +		$(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) \
> > +		./Configure \
> > +			linux-$(OPENSSL_TARGET_ARCH) \
> > +			--prefix=/usr \
> > +			--openssldir=/usr/lib/ssl \
> > +			threads \
> > +			shared \
> > +			no-idea \
> > +			no-mdc2 \
> > +			no-rc5 \
> > +			zlib-dynamic \
> >  	)
> 
> Once you've overriden the CONFIGURE stage, is there much benefit left in
> using Makefile.autotools.in?
> 

The Makefile is smaller now, and IMHO easier to read.

Installation of man pages, info pages and header/development works
better now.

I though the autotools was not purely for autotools stuff, but a way to
make every package simpler to read and install in a more general way?

-- 
With kind regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt, Applications Engineer




More information about the buildroot mailing list