[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/sdl

[Rex Ashbaugh]

DirectFB is not required.
SDL only needs the directfb.h header to build, in case directfb might be
invoked later at run time.
directfb is not used by default by SDL


-Rex


On 7/25/07, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf at atmel.com> wrote:
>
> tor 2007-07-26 klockan 00:39 +0200 skrev Bernhard Fischer:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:39:27AM -0700, ulf at uclibc.org wrote:
> > >Author: ulf
> > >Date: 2007-07-25 10:39:26 -0700 (Wed, 25 Jul 2007)
> > >New Revision: 19261
> > >
> > >Log:
> > >Make SDL seled DirectFB
> > >
> > >Modified:
> > >   trunk/buildroot/package/sdl/Config.in
> > >
> > >
> > >Changeset:
> > >Modified: trunk/buildroot/package/sdl/Config.in
> > >===================================================================
> > >--- trunk/buildroot/package/sdl/Config.in    2007-07-25 17:37:50 UTC
> (rev 19260)
> > >+++ trunk/buildroot/package/sdl/Config.in    2007-07-25 17:39:26 UTC
> (rev 19261)
> > >@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > > config BR2_PACKAGE_SDL
> > >     bool "SDL"
> > >     default n
> > >+    select BR2_PACKAGE_DIRECTFB
> >
> > Why? It's perfectly fine to build SDL without
> > a) FB support (any FB support)
> > b) with the stock FB (no directfb)
> >
>
> The SDL compile failed since "directfb.h" could not be found
> so I made the assumption, that it was neccessary.
> Maybe I was wrong, but if it is not required, why the error message?
>
>
> > If you want directfb and directfb-support, the you should select it
> > manually, no?
>
> Best Regards
> Ulf Samuelsson
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20070725/24f65d50/attachment-0002.htm